home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0406>
- <title>
- Apr. 18, 1994: Come On In. No, Stay Out.
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Apr. 18, 1994 Is It All Over for Smokers?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- LAW ENFORCEMENT, Page 38
- Come On In. No, Stay Out.
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Many Chicago tenants back no-warrant searches of apartments
- for guns, but a judge orders a halt
- </p>
- <p>By George J. Church--Reported by Elizabeth Taylor/Chicago
- </p>
- <p> Shining his flashlight around the dark corridors of a Chicago
- public-housing project, a police officer whose street name is
- Ghost (his real name is Enriquito Florez) illuminates some places
- where he has found hidden guns: behind broken exit signs, behind
- an electrical panel, atop a doorframe. On this night his light
- flashes on a hallway garbage drop that has been left open, with
- twine flapping loose; someone had apparently tied a gun inside
- but hastily wrenched it loose. Inside apartments, the officer
- relates, he has found cocaine in a container of Comet cleanser,
- guns hidden inside toilets and, once, under water in a mop bucket.
- And that was when gang members agreed to let him in, thinking
- they had hidden drugs and firearms so cleverly that Ghost would
- pronounce their quarters clean. Imagine what he might find if
- he could just bust into any apartment he wanted.
- </p>
- <p> Well, he can't. U.S. District Judge Wayne Andersen last week
- issued an injunction reaffirming a February restraining order
- that forbade the police to conduct sweeps of public-housing
- projects during which they searched apartments without obtaining
- warrants. The judge in March modified the order to allow cops
- to ransack without warning a building's "common areas" (lobbies,
- hallways, stairwells), and it was such a "vertical patrol" of
- the Stateway Gardens complex that Ghost joined. But Judge Andersen
- agreed with an American Civil Liberties Union complaint that
- warrantless searches of individual apartments violated the Fourth
- Amendment to the Constitution, which forbids "unreasonable searches
- and seizures."
- </p>
- <p> Those who disagree include no small number of the people the
- ACLU claims to be representing: the tenants of public-housing
- projects. In the Robert Taylor Homes just south of Stateway
- Gardens, Ray Goodwin, 9, describes how one of his friends was
- gunned down on the monkey bars in a neighborhood playground
- "because he didn't want to be in a gang." Says Goodwin: "I want
- the sweeps. There be too many guns in our buildings." Around
- Easter they went off at an especially horrifying rate: after
- a truce between the Black Disciples and Gangster Disciples gangs
- apparently broke down, police recorded more than 300 shooting
- incidents in the Robert Taylor Homes and Stateway Gardens in
- only four days. In Stateway Gardens, Juanita Bishop counts five
- other tenants she knew who were killed by guns and says, "I'm
- for the whole sweep. Then we could let our kids outside."
- </p>
- <p> ACLU lawyer Harvey Grossman protests that "doing searches of
- apartments is a meaningless gesture. Weapons come back." Tom
- Sullivan, a lawyer for pro-sweep residents, agrees that the
- searches are only "a Band-Aid." Even Vincent Lane, chairman
- of the Chicago housing authority, thinks a long-run solution
- would have to be really drastic: "We ought to be looking for
- ways to get rid of the Robert Taylor Homes of the world and
- provide [different]housing for poor people."
- </p>
- <p> But the houses will be around awhile, and so will the controversy.
- Lane began the weapon sweeps in 1988, restricted them a year
- later to cases involving "immediate threat" after negotiating
- a court-ordered consent decree with the ACLU, then resumed them
- after armed gang members chased away repair crews dispatched
- by the housing authority from a project last August. That led
- to the restraining order that Judge Andersen has turned into
- an injunction. Lane says he will respect that ruling--for
- now. But "if the circumstances that existed two weeks ago, when
- we heard 300 shots, exist again, I will search for weapons"--warrants or no.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-